|
Combining medications with alcohol and driving.
Combining certain medications with alcohol increases
crash risk. Sedatives and tranquilizers alone can
impair driving skills and can impair them even more
when combined with alcohol. For example, low doses of
"flurazepam", a sedative-hypnotic prescribed for the
treatment of insomnia, alone can impair a driver's
ability to steer. The effect of this medication can
be compounded with even a small dose of alcohol
consumed the next morning. Driving skills can be
impaired by other medications, such as codeine, as
prescribed to treat moderately severe pain. When
combined with alcohol, such medications' adverse
effects on driving skills are exacerbated, as are the
effects of some antidepressants, most antihistamines,
certain cardiovascular medications, and some
antipsychotic medications.
Alcohol tolerance. The repeated performance of a
particular task in association with alcohol
consumption can lead to the development of a form of
adaptation referred to as "learned" or "behavioral"
tolerance. Learned tolerance can reduce the
alcohol-induced impairment that would ordinarily
accompany the performance of that particular task.
However, when conditions change or when something
unexpected occurs, the tolerance acquired for that
task can be negated.
These findings may be applicable to the performance
of tasks involved in drinking and driving. A driver
who has developed behavioral tolerance to driving a
familiar car over a particular route under routine
circumstances may drive without being involved in a
crash, despite consumption of some alcohol. However,
when encountering a novel environment , for example,
a detour or an unexpected situation, such as a
bicycle darting in front of the car, this same driver
would be at the same risk for a crash as a novice
driver at the same BAC, due to lack of prior learning
opportunities for these unexpected events.
:: top ::
Legal Sanctions for DUI Offenders
Legal sanctions, such as
driver's license
suspension and court-ordered alcoholism treatment,
are designed to deter drinking and driving.
Driver's
license suspension and license revocation seem to be
the most effective deterrents among the general
driving population. However, a meta-analysis of
deterrent strategies targeted to the
drinking-and-driving population concluded that the
most effective means for reducing re-arrest for
driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) and
crashes was a combination of license suspension and
interventions such as education,
psychotherapy/counseling, and some follow up.
Researchers contend that court-ordered treatment
should be considered an adjunct, not an alternative,
to license sanctions. According to Sadler and
colleagues, a DUI conviction should serve to identify
problem drinkers and guide or coerce them into
alcohol treatment.
Alcohol treatment for DUI
offenders can range from short-term educational
sessions to therapy programs lasting at least 1 year.
Treatment of convicted drinking drivers normally
emphasizes modifying drinking behavior. The type and
duration of treatment depend on factors such as the
severity of the person's drinking problem and DUI
history. DUI offenders with less severe drinking
problems benefit most from educational programs,
although no known model is thought to be most
effective in reducing recidivism or alcohol-related
crashes. For repeat offenders or those with more severe drinking problems, therapy that lasts for at least
12 months and that includes intensive programs
focused on the individual appears to be most
effective.
:: top ::
Prevention
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(NHTSA) credits State laws raising the legal drinking
age to 21 with preventing almost 1,000 traffic deaths
annually. Legislation to reduce the BAC limit to 0.02
percent or lower, referred to as the "zero tolerance
law" for young drivers, has been passed to reduce
alcohol-related fatalities further. The National
Highway Systems Act provides incentives for all
States to reduce their BAC limits for drivers under
21 to 0.02 percent beginning October 1, 1998.
One study examined the effectiveness of lowering
BAC limits for young people in States where such laws
have been in force for at least 1 year. The
researchers found that after the BAC limits were
lowered to 0.00 or 0.02 percent, the proportion of
nighttime fatal crashes involving single vehicles in
this age group dropped 16 percent
Source: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
|